Standing up zero-trust access across nine countries.
Aperture needed one identity plane before a regulatory review. Gate issued the first production token twelve days after kickoff.
0 standing privileges
- Customer
- Aperture Diagnostics
- Sector
- Diagnostic imaging and pathology services

- Scale
- 6,800 staff across 41 sites in nine countries
- Duration
- Twelve days to the first production token, fourteen weeks to full coverage
4 phases, in the order they happened.
- Days 1–12
Ghent pilot: HR-sourced identity feed built, first production token issued on day twelve.
- Weeks 3–6
Benelux and France. Time-bound elevation replaces the site administrator role for 1,940 accounts.
- Weeks 7–11
The remaining six countries, two a fortnight. Vendor access moved onto ticket-bound sessions.
- Weeks 12–14
Legacy directories demoted to consumers, orphaned accounts closed, regulator evidence pack produced from Sentinel.
What changed, measured.
Every figure came from Aperture Diagnostics. Where one is a median or a sample it says so.
0
Standing privileges
1,940 permanent administrative grants replaced by time-bound elevation.
4,612
Accounts closed
Against 11,400 found at the start, for 6,800 employees.
12 days
To the first production token
Ghent, 210 staff, on the HR-sourced identity feed.
9 minutes
Median time to elevated access
Across 2,300 requests in the first quarter. The old route was a ticket with a two-day target.
Nine countries, nine ways in.
Aperture's imaging centres were acquired or built over eighteen years, and access to the picture archive was granted per site, by the site. A radiographer moving from Lyon to Ghent was given a new account rather than a transferred one, and the Lyon account usually stayed open behind them.
A count taken in January found 11,400 active accounts against 6,800 employees. Of those, 2,140 had not authenticated in over a year and 148 belonged to people who had left, three of them more than four years earlier.
A national regulator had given notice of a review of access controls over patient imaging, with a date attached. That date is what turned an acknowledged problem into a programme.
Standing privilege is the part that is hard to remove.
Everyone agrees that leavers should be offboarded. The harder problem is the account that is legitimately in daily use and permanently over-scoped.
Two patterns accounted for most of it. Radiologists reporting across sites had been given site administrator rights, because that was the only role that let them open a study from another centre. And the third-party engineers who maintain the modality software held permanent accounts, because raising access each time took longer than the fault they had come to fix.
Neither is solved by deleting accounts. Both are solved by making elevated access temporary and making the temporary path quicker than the permanent one. Otherwise people route around it, and you have added a control that only inconveniences the compliant.
- 1,940 accounts held site administrator rights. Sixty-two of them needed to.
- Vendor support access averaged 313 days of standing privilege per engineer.
- No record anywhere of who had approved any of it.
Twelve days to the first token.
Gate went in against one site first. Ghent, 210 staff. Identity was seeded from the HR record rather than from the existing directories, and that single decision made the rest of the programme possible: joiners, movers and leavers now originate in one place, and the nine directories became consumers instead of sources.
Elevation replaced standing rights. A radiologist opening a study from another centre gets access to that study for eight hours, approved by their own clinical lead and logged against the accession number. Vendor engineers request a session bound to a named fault ticket, and the session expires when the ticket closes.
Sentinel takes Gate's decision log. The evidence the regulator asked for (who could open which study on a given date, and on whose approval) is now a query rather than a project.
The review asked us one question we could not have answered in January: who could have opened this patient's study on the fourteenth of March, and who said they could. It takes about forty seconds now.
Three others, from three different starting points.
Different sector, different product, the same argument about where the data should live.
34% shorter sales cycle
CEDX Pulse
Rebuilding a revenue engine on one system of record
Northbeam · Freight forwarding and contract logistics
3,140 staff across eleven countries · Eleven weeks, kickoff to final regional cutover
2-day close, down from 14
CEDX Ledger
Closing the books on the second working day
Tidepool Marine · Aquaculture and seafood processing
1,480 staff, six sites, three reporting currencies · Sixteen weeks, with the first two-day close at the fourth month end
45-minute first response
qDesk
Halving first-response time without adding headcount
Helix Instruments · Laboratory instruments and consumables
620 staff, 14,300 support contacts a month · Nine weeks
See what Identity does before you read another story.
One identity. Every application. Zero standing trust. There is a full trial on identity.cedxsystems.com, and an engineer who has run a migration like this one will walk it with you.
